Renaming subject since the discussion may be long. Allow me to quote Todd from another email thread:
bq. I think we should be especially conservative about adding even non-invasive features to "stable" branches. Since 0.94 is considered stable, should the above be applicable ? Thanks On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:31 PM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: > Wait! 0.94 is the current stable release. Did you just re-point the stable > pointer to 0.92? > 0.92 is a maintenance release. > > Are we telling new users to install 0.92.x or 0.94.x? For sure this should > be 0.94.x. > > > -- Lars > > > > ________________________________ > From: Ted Yu <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 3:13 PM > Subject: Re: ANN: The second hbase 0.92.2 release candidate is available > for download > > I wasn't fully aware of the 3 binding vote rule. > > I have restored the symlink. > > Cheers > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > J-D: > > > So far we have 2 +1 (binding) and 2 +1 (non-binding), no -1 on RC1. > > > > > > Do you think I can roll this RC as 0.92.2 ? > > > > Looks like you already did yesterday? > > > > http://apache.cs.utah.edu/hbase/stable/ > > > > J-D > > >
