I think there seem to be two concepts here (as J-D said in his first email): stable release vs. stable branch.
So how should we interpret this single stable symlink ? Thanks On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected]>wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > Let's consider the following scenario in chronological order: > > 0.92.x is released > > 0.94.y is released > > 0.92.x+1 is released > > > > Would the stable symlink point alternately to each of the releases as > > they're available ? > > That would really not work and I'm sure you can think of a few reasons > why (like people jumping from 0.94 to 0.92 to 0.94). > > > > > Or should we have two symlinks, one for 0.92 branch, one for 0.94 branch > ? > > Why. > > J-D >
