That said, let's make sure every backport has meaningful justification (determined by consensus).
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > -1 until we have an actual stable 0.96 release. > > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Elliott Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Lately there have been a lot of issues being committed to trunk and >> also back-ported to 0.94 (I've done it myself too). Since we're so far >> into 0.94's release cycle should we think about not allowing minor >> features >> and code clean ups to be back-ported ? > > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
