Hey guys, I saw HBASE-7814 [1] -- a backport committed to 0.94 that makes HBase 0.94 now require Hadoop 1.0 (instead of the older hadoops). This was supposed to be a new requirement for hbase 0.96.0. [2]
Are we ok with making the next 0.94 upgrade incompatible? (And if we are we need to release note this kind of stuff). Jon. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7814 [2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hbase-dev/201210.mbox/%3ccadcmmghtqx73jzte4schy04iqs9npzp3u84hm2sm7icl6r8...@mail.gmail.com%3E On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> wrote: > The backporting situation for 0.94 is an exception it seems, because of the > fact that 96 is so late. But until 96 comes out, we can keep up the current > approach. It has worked mostly for the time being. > > Enis > > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > >> That said, let's make sure every backport has meaningful justification >> (determined by consensus). >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > -1 until we have an actual stable 0.96 release. >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Elliott Clark <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> Lately there have been a lot of issues being committed to trunk and >> >> also back-ported to 0.94 (I've done it myself too). Since we're so far >> >> into 0.94's release cycle should we think about not allowing minor >> >> features >> >> and code clean ups to be back-ported ? >> > >> > >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> >> - Andy >> >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein >> (via Tom White) >> -- // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) // Software Engineer, Cloudera // [email protected]
