bq. to put the 0.95/0.96 branch off until, when? As Elliot indicated, HBASE-7012 'Move classes into hbase-client' should go in. That, in turn, depends on RPC / Cell serialization to stabilize a little bit.
Maybe branch after these patches go in ? Again, just my personal assessment. On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I am generally fine with branching. > > > > Looking at the blocker / critical bug list for 0.96, the number of such > > issues (39 as of writing of this email) increased compared to a few days > > ago. > > People marked their JIRAs this way so that their work gets picked up for > > 0.96 > > > > Considering that all the fixes for these issues would be integrated twice > > once branching happens, I wonder if there should be a short buffer before > > branching so that some of these high priority fixes can go in. > > > > Yeah. This is a problem. We have been running for months w/ blockers and > criticals at about 8 and 30 count respectively and the number hasn't been > dropping. That the number has gone up because we've called for branch is > good I think because it means folks are starting to act as though 0.95/0.96 > is going to happen whereas -- witness the unchanged blocker/critical count > over months -- this was not the case previously. > > Regards the pain of committing in multiple places, yeah, I think there is > no way out around it, not unless we want to put the 0.95/0.96 branch off > until, when? > > Thanks, > St.Ack >
