+1 for the proposal, including, branching, and the branch names. Enis
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > Great! > > Also like that trunk will become 0.97-SNAPSHOT soon. I have some in > progress work that I would like to propose for the ~0.98 timeframe, would > be good to land a patch against a branch for that. > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Nicolas Liochon <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > To understand: we will have another branch? So trunk will be tagged > 0.97 > > to > > > be released in 0.98? > > > > > > > Yes. Trunk will become 0.97-SNAPSHOT (unless someone has a better idea). > > It will follow the 0.89/0.95 pattern and will become 0.97.0 or we will > > just jump to 0.98.0 on release. > > > > St.Ack > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) >
