You the man Elliott. This is a big code move so would be good to have this side of the branch. If you can't do it on the w/e, we can do it post-branch too.
Thanks, St.Ack On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Elliott Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > I'll try and get that to you tonight or at least this weekend so you can > branch on schedule. > On Feb 22, 2013 4:30 PM, "Stack" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Elliott Clark <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > When we think APIs and wire-format sufficiently stabilized, we'll > then > > > cut > > > > a 0.96 from the 0.95 branch and release 0.96.0, etc., from here on > out. > > > > > > > > > > We need to do the client move before the branch. Other than that > sounds > > > good. > > > > > > > > > You waiting on me (rpc) Elliott? If so, don't I'd say. I can rebase no > > problem and I don't see the last part of the rpc going in until it has > had > > a good bit more review and a bit of profiling done. > > > > Agree would be nice getting client refactor in before branch. Its a big > > code move. > > > > St.Ack > > >
