I don't think so. Let's be smart about this; we can look at a patch and see whether we need a full test run or not.
-- Lars ________________________________ From: Ted Yu <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 12:14 PM Subject: Re: 0.94 automated tests In case of patch that only involves changes to test(s), such as HBASE-8106, is full test run required ? Thanks On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > I think that fine for getting something into our current 'stable' offering. > St.Ack > > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:46 AM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Ubuntu 3 is currently down. It used to be our most reliable test > > environment. > > Until that is fixed I would like to propose requiring a full test run > > before anything is committed to 0.94. > > > > Comments/Concerns? This is pretty annoying, but I do not see any way > > around this. > > > > > > -- Lars > > >
