Agreed Lars. +1. Regards Ram
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 7:06 AM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't think so. > > Let's be smart about this; we can look at a patch and see whether we need > a full test run or not. > > > -- Lars > > > ________________________________ > From: Ted Yu <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 12:14 PM > Subject: Re: 0.94 automated tests > > In case of patch that only involves changes to test(s), such as HBASE-8106, > is full test run required ? > > Thanks > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I think that fine for getting something into our current 'stable' > offering. > > St.Ack > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:46 AM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Ubuntu 3 is currently down. It used to be our most reliable test > > > environment. > > > Until that is fixed I would like to propose requiring a full test run > > > before anything is committed to 0.94. > > > > > > Comments/Concerns? This is pretty annoying, but I do not see any way > > > around this. > > > > > > > > > -- Lars > > > > > >
