On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > In the patch, it looks to me that v3 is not a true new type but just an h2 > w/ tags shoehorned in. Going forward v3 will not be extensible as done. >
I think that's a case of only extending what is needed at this time. More V2 classes can be subclassed or replaced as required? -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
