>>(My objection is the nomenclature -- if you have to do the overloads to get in your tags, go for it) We are trying to avoid this. Will review internally and try to arrive at an approach sooner. And also at other comments. Thanks Stack.
Regards Ram On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Elliott Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > Main objection is that the included v3 is not a 'green field'/redo so > lets > > not call it that > > We added minor version into hfile versioning (Broke things while doing > it), so maybe it's better to call it 2.5 ? >
