On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Anyways, if you fellas can't wait anymore, just say and we'll figure out > something. > As I see it, HBASE-9563 is committed, It is still open and committed with qualification "Stack:...Was going to try this first but likely needs more..." and "Elliott: +1 I think it's an improvement even if it doesn't 100% fix the master issue." > and HBASE-9696 is not a blocker > against 0.96. But if you argue that 9696 is indeed a blocker, let's raise > it as such. Agree. > There is no point in creating an RC, an immediately sinking it > if we cannot verify the RC for a +1. We don't run into data loss issues > anymore which is why I still think we can release 0.96 even without 9696 > and 9724. Nothing is preventing us to release 0.96.1, with this and more > fixes in let's say a couple of weeks or months. > > I guess let's wait for tomorrow to see whether there is any progress on > 9563 and 9696. > Yes. Lets take this up tomorrow. Elliott and I are on the master issue, HBASE-9563, this evening. Thanks Enis, St.Ack
