Can we agree if the IT tests are green for a certain number of runs in a row, then it's stable?
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Sergey Shelukhin <[email protected]>wrote: > It looks like HBASE-9724 got committed. Was it the final patch for it? It's > a small and hopefully safe. > > If patch is large and risky, and the feature it fixes is semi-experimental, > like HBASE-9696, IMHO it should not be blocker for the release. > The concern is that we keep making large changes to AM that fix some bugs > but may introduce more bugs (like it happened with the last one), so it's > hard to tell when it will stabilize at all. > > > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Elliott Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > To me it feels like HBASE-9724 should go into 0.96. We're not releasing > a > > new rc tonight, it seems really weird to hold up a bug fix to try and hit > > some unknown, and un-agreed upon, deadline. > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> > Anyways, if you fellas can't wait anymore, just say and we'll figure > > out > > >> something. > > >> As I see it, HBASE-9563 is committed, > > > > > > > > > It is still open and committed with qualification "Stack:...Was going > to > > > try this first but likely needs more..." and "Elliott: +1 I think it's > > > an improvement even if it doesn't 100% fix the master issue." > > > > > > > > > > > >> and HBASE-9696 is not a blocker > > >> against 0.96. But if you argue that 9696 is indeed a blocker, let's > > raise > > >> it as such. > > > > > > > > > > > > Agree. > > > > > > > > > > > >> There is no point in creating an RC, an immediately sinking it > > >> if we cannot verify the RC for a +1. We don't run into data loss > issues > > >> anymore which is why I still think we can release 0.96 even without > 9696 > > >> and 9724. Nothing is preventing us to release 0.96.1, with this and > more > > >> fixes in let's say a couple of weeks or months. > > >> > > >> I guess let's wait for tomorrow to see whether there is any progress > on > > >> 9563 and 9696. > > >> > > > > > > Yes. Lets take this up tomorrow. Elliott and I are on the master > issue, > > > HBASE-9563, this evening. > > > > > > Thanks Enis, > > > St.Ack > > > > > > > -- > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately > and delete it from your system. Thank You. >
