Thanks for clarifying, Andy. If we want to avoid having bug fixes in 0.94 and 0.96 but not in 0.98 (as we should) that means that all fixes to those branches are gated by you. Fine, as long as you don't go on vacation :)
-- Lars ________________________________ From: Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, December 25, 2013 10:57 AM Subject: Re: Branch 0.98 update and soft freeze There was a bit of discussion about this on HBASE-7226. For the next couple of weeks, please mention me in the JIRA using "[~apurtell]" (remove the quotes) and I will come take a look. Normally that won't be necessary. The reason I asked for a heads up before commits to 0.98 for the next few weeks is I want to start attacking unit test failures and clean them up to 0. On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > Happy holidays all. > > As of today, there are 12 issues remaining with a fix version of 0.98.0. > Before cutting a RC I plan on addressing HBASE-6873, HBASE-9941, > HBASE-9945, and maybe HBASE-9845. My understanding is others are working on > HBASE-7781, HBASE-9681, HBASE-9846, HBASE-9858, HBASE-10221, and > HBASE-10228. There are a couple others. Let's see what we can get done by > the end of the month. > > On trunk and 0.98 a number of unit tests are acting flaky lately on > builds.apache.org and my private Jenkins. No time like the present to get > started on fixing them. > > Accordingly, please, no more commits to 0.98 branch without getting an ack > from me first. > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
