There is also a suspicious failure in https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.98/100/ that I'm now looking into.
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > I apologize for the delay in tagging the 0.98.0 RC. There is one > outstanding blocker - HBASE-10322. I think we have rounded the curve and > are headed home on it. In the meantime holding up the RC has been a net > positive I think, we've had issues come up like HBASE-10384 and the > opportunity to get them into the RC. In addition I've had time to fix some > lingering coprocessor related issues. > > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Yes, as long as we keep filing blockers there won't be any RC. >> >> >> On Sunday, January 12, 2014, Stack wrote: >> >>> HBASE-10321 should be done before RC I'd say. >>> Sounds good Andrew, >>> St.Ack >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected] >>> >wrote: >>> >>> > I am just about ready to tag the 0.98.0RC and release the branch. >>> There are >>> > two items left that are a must I feel: >>> > - HBASE-6873, which I will get to at the next opportunity >>> > - An issue with insuring tags are not inappropriately sent back to >>> > unprivileged users, which Ram and Anoop have been discussing here, and >>> I >>> > think Anoop will post a JIRA and patch for soon. >>> > >> >> > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
