I'd be volunteering for RM.Maybe do it together?
Personally I'd like to see some heavy production usage of 0.96 or 0.98 in the 
community before can call the new "DNA" (HBase >= 0.96) 1.0.

-- Lars



________________________________
 From: Stack <st...@duboce.net>
To: HBase Dev List <dev@hbase.apache.org> 
Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2014 11:26 AM
Subject: DISCUSSION: 1.0.0
 

Andrew is talking of the first 0.98RC being imminent.

Time to start in on the release that will follow 0.98.x.  We seem to all be
good with calling it 1.0.0.  Speak up if you think different. (I just added
a 1.0.0 version to JIRA).

+ What should 1.0.0 have in it beyond what is in 0.98.
+ Why can't 1.0.0 just be 0.98.0, or 0.98.1 altogether?
+ When should it come out?  I'm thinking soon after 0.98. Feb/March?
(Presuming 0.98 ships in Jan).
+ Who should RM it? (I could but perhaps others are interested).

What else should we consider achieving the state of 1.0.0ness?

Happy New Year all,
St.Ack

Reply via email to