On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 1:52 PM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> wrote:
> I'm happy to volunteer. Happy if Enis does it, too. > > I'd be happy to do it too but my thinking is that it is good to spread the role around. St.Ack > ------------------------------ > *From:* Stack <st...@duboce.net> > *To:* HBase Dev List <dev@hbase.apache.org> > *Cc:* lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> > *Sent:* Monday, January 20, 2014 1:43 PM > *Subject:* Re: DISCUSSION: 1.0.0 > > On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Enis Söztutar <e...@apache.org> wrote: > > I think whether we will need a new RM will depend on the decision to > release 1.0 from 0.98 branches or 0.99 branches(current trunk). > > > I think it should have an RM regardless. We should probably try to put a > higher polish on a 1.0 than we would mayhaps on a lesser release. RM will > have enough work on their plate just keeping up state (IMO). > > > > We can do the previous practice of releasing 0.99.0, then turning 0.99.x as > the 1.0.0. In that case, I can also volunteer as well. > > > Good by me. Anyone else interested in the job? Speak up if so. > > If not, you'd get it by default Enis. Else you and whoever will have to > dook it out. > > St.Ack > > >
