On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 1:02 AM, Nicolas Liochon <[email protected]> wrote: > Should we not rename ZeroCopyLiteralByteString to something like > HBasePrivateZeroCopyLiteralByteString to be sure that we won't have name > conflicts in the future?
I don't mind keeping the same name as long as we agree on the API. I don't expect this class to change much if at all anyway. It's just really unfortunate that this method was changed, what's more with a signature that renders it unusable. -- Benoit "tsuna" Sigoure
