It is desirable if HBASE-9203, the umbrella JIRA for secondary indexing, is given some reviews.
Cheers On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Jeffrey Zhong <jzh...@hortonworks.com>wrote: > > + HBASE-8763 Combine MVCC and SeqId > Currently replication is broken on same version updates in the following > scenarios: when a region move or RS get restarted in the source cluster, > replicated changes may come out of order to the receiving RS. There are > other cases we need to keep the ordering of puts. This JIRA can be used to > fix those above issues. > > + Replicated Meta Regions for Distributed Region Location Lookup(I haven't > cut a JIRA for it but I've been thinking this for a while) > > > On 2/10/14 4:42 PM, "lars hofhansl" <la...@apache.org> wrote: > > >+ a clearly defined compatibility strategy between patch, minor, and > >major versions > >+ known coprocessor interfaces. For example right now a coprocessor can > >use everything on HRegion. We need to distill what's useful into an > >interface. > >+ (wishes for ponies and unicorns, probably not going to happen) better > >ops supports, such as sample puppet/chef/etc scripts > > > > > > > >________________________________ > > From: Stack <st...@duboce.net> > >To: HBase Dev List <dev@hbase.apache.org> > >Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 4:29 PM > >Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: 1.0.0 > > > > > >Keep them coming and I'll file issues against 1.0 version. > >Thanks lads, > >St.Ack > > > > > > > >On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Enis Söztutar <enis....@gmail.com> > >wrote: > > > >> + fix interface audience annotations (HBASE-10462). > >> + Continue on limiting some broad reaching interfaces (HCM, HCI, HTable) > >> See recent HBASE-10479 discussions) > >> + Promote HTableInterface vs HTable, getting connections from HCM and > >> getting tables there. > >> > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > >> > >> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Steve Loughran > >><ste...@hortonworks.com > >> > >wrote: > >> > > >> > > On 10 February 2014 09:24, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Suggestions for 1.0.0 if if it is to come out in next month or so: > >> > > > > >> > > > + Update included libs (e.g. move to log4j2) > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > love to see how that goes on -it looks good but I've not seen it in > >> > > production yet. I do note it has a NoSQL outputter, so there are > >>good > >> > > opportunities for recursion > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Smile. > >> > > > > > -- > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately > and delete it from your system. Thank You. >
