HBASE-10856 has 8 open subtasks, 6 of which are not assigned. Four other JIRAs (HBASE-9864, HBASE-11122, HBASE-11124, and HBASE-11225) are incorporated by reference and are open. Those could be dropped. All but HBASE-11122 represent significant work.
My guess based on the lack of activity on the 1.0 JIRA is it will be open for a long time without much attention. Perhaps we can instead move much to a new JIRA serving as an umbrella for 1.1 and call 1.0 as imminent. Merge HBASE-10070 into trunk - if the vote passes - and then only keep the issues for updating documentation and testing rolling restart / compat with 0.98? On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > 1.0.0 has been going on for a while now. Master has a bunch of good stuff > in it . What are we thinking of as a release date for the first 0.99.0 and > for 1.0.0 itself? > > Thanks, > St.Ack > > > > > On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > Andrew is talking of the first 0.98RC being imminent. > > > > Time to start in on the release that will follow 0.98.x. We seem to all > > be good with calling it 1.0.0. Speak up if you think different. (I just > > added a 1.0.0 version to JIRA). > > > > + What should 1.0.0 have in it beyond what is in 0.98. > > + Why can't 1.0.0 just be 0.98.0, or 0.98.1 altogether? > > + When should it come out? I'm thinking soon after 0.98. Feb/March? > > (Presuming 0.98 ships in Jan). > > + Who should RM it? (I could but perhaps others are interested). > > > > What else should we consider achieving the state of 1.0.0ness? > > > > Happy New Year all, > > St.Ack > > > > > > > > > > > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
