I would love to drop hadoop-1 support as soon as possible, but I don't think we should do it in HBase-1.0.
Hadoop-2.2 which is the first GA release of Hadoop, was released in October 2013. It is not enough time passed to drop support I feel. Enis On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 5:07 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <j...@cloudera.com> wrote: > I'd be ok with saying hadoop2.0 as a min for hbase 1.0. If we can support > fewer versions we have fewer compat cases to maintain and can clean up code > sooner. > > 0.96 defaults to 1.x > 0.98 defaults to 2.x > trunk defaults to 2.x > > The major distros (CDH, HWX, Intel?) have been on hadoop2 so we'd be > keeping support for other users. Can we do a quick survey on user@ to see > if we should support it? > > Jon. > > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > bq. I'll update that chart > > > > Please do so. > > > > bq. should 1.0 support hadoop1 > > > > hadoop1 support should be kept. > > This would allow users whose hbase deployment only occupies a portion of > > the whole hadoop-1 cluster flexibility of upgrading hbase only. > > > > Cheers > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Enis Söztutar <e...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > The matrix in http://hbase.apache.org/book/configuration.html shows > that > > > 0.98 DOES NOT support hadoop-1. > > > > > > I though we kept the support in 0.98. We have the build profile and > > jenkins > > > build, etc. Did we decide to drop support. Maybe I am misremembering. > > > > > > I'll update that chart otherwise. > > > > > > While we are at it, should 1.0 support hadoop1 or not. I think it would > > be > > > good to keep support for h1 in 1.0, and drop it in 2.0 line. But it > would > > > mean if we do not drop support, we have to keep the support through > 1.1, > > > 1.2, etc. > > > > > > Enis > > > > > > > > > -- > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) > // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera > // j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh >
