I suppose the next question is: Do we intentionally drop it, or just not spend any additional time on it? (I.e. some new features might not work with Hadoop-1, etc). We could keep the -hadoop1 test suites running and fix failures, but not do anything beyond that.
-- Lars ________________________________ From: Stack <st...@duboce.net> To: HBase Dev List <dev@hbase.apache.org>; lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 11:39 AM Subject: Re: Hadoop1 support in 0.98/1.0 (Good discusssion) Intellectually and if we go by the numbers, it makes 'sense' keeping hadoop1 support in hbase1. But if we instead allow that our versioning currently is of-kilter -- Lars Hofhansl has argued off-line that 0.96.0 should have been 1.0 -- and if we are realistic and ask the question, who of us here has the time and interest supporting a hbase1 on hadoop1 (not I!, No one?), and as per Andy above, h2 is just better all around, then IMO hadoop1 should be dropped in 1.0 (Is it too late to deprecate in 0.98?). St.Ack On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 5:45 PM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 on dropping Hadoop 1 support after 0.98. > If we want to tie HBase performance featured a bit closer to Hadoop > features it seems we have to do that. > > > -- Lars > > > > ________________________________ > From: Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> > To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org> > Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2014 5:09 PM > Subject: Re: Hadoop1 support in 0.98/1.0 > > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 4:57 AM, Enis Söztutar <enis....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hadoop-2.2 which is the first GA release of Hadoop, was released in > October > > 2013. It is not enough time passed to drop support I feel. > > > > This makes a lot of sense for 0.94. That is our (un)official (?) > long-term-stable release. > > The 0.96 "singularity" was released around the same time as Hadoop 2.2, > certainly our 0.98 was, and since the stability of the stack is the sum of > its parts for those releases I'm not sure what Hadoop 1 offers besides the > burden of legacy interfaces and lower performance. > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) >
