There is some penalty of transition from native code to JNI and back but I would expect it definitely performs better than a Thrift based client. Will publish performance (comparison) figures soon.
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 1:36 AM, haosdent <[email protected]> wrote: > Cool. So it have a better peformance? > > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Aditya <[email protected]> wrote: > >> No, it does not. It uses a modified version of AsyncHBase >> library<http://goo.gl/aikZDn>over JNI. >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 12:31 AM, haosdent <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, Aditya. Thank you for your great job. I am very exciting about these >>> issues. If libhbase depends on Thrift? >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Aditya <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Pursuant to the JIRAs >>>> HBASE-10168<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10168>, >>>> HBASE-9977 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9977> and >>>> HBASE-9835<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9835>I am happy >>>> >>>> to announce that the first draft of a JNI based implementation >>>> of C APIs for HBase is now available for your review. >>>> >>>> The source and instructions to build and use is available at MapR's >>>> Github >>>> repository <http://goo.gl/dE5tzB>. A slide from my presentation on the >>>> same >>>> can be downloaded from the meetup site <http://goo.gl/nfXx9f>. >>>> >>>> >>>> Would put the patches on the respective JIRA shortly. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> aditya... >>>> >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9835> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best Regards, >>> Haosdent Huang >>> >> >> > > > -- > Best Regards, > Haosdent Huang >
