> Will publish performance (comparison) figures soon. Great job!
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Aditya <[email protected]> wrote: > There is some penalty of transition from native code to JNI and back but I > would expect it definitely performs better than a Thrift based client. Will > publish performance (comparison) figures soon. > > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 1:36 AM, haosdent <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Cool. So it have a better peformance? >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Aditya <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> No, it does not. It uses a modified version of AsyncHBase >>> library<http://goo.gl/aikZDn>over JNI. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 12:31 AM, haosdent <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, Aditya. Thank you for your great job. I am very exciting about >>>> these issues. If libhbase depends on Thrift? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Aditya <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Pursuant to the JIRAs >>>>> HBASE-10168<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10168>, >>>>> HBASE-9977 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9977> and >>>>> HBASE-9835<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9835>I am happy >>>>> >>>>> to announce that the first draft of a JNI based implementation >>>>> of C APIs for HBase is now available for your review. >>>>> >>>>> The source and instructions to build and use is available at MapR's >>>>> Github >>>>> repository <http://goo.gl/dE5tzB>. A slide from my presentation on >>>>> the same >>>>> can be downloaded from the meetup site <http://goo.gl/nfXx9f>. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Would put the patches on the respective JIRA shortly. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> aditya... >>>>> >>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9835> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Best Regards, >>>> Haosdent Huang >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Best Regards, >> Haosdent Huang >> > > -- Best Regards, Haosdent Huang
