Jean-Marc: Thanks for posting results. It is not easy to read. Can you reformat the results ?
On Jul 3, 2014, at 6:10 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[email protected]> wrote: > Here are the perfs tests results. Someone on the user list asked few days > ago about perfs between 0.94 and 0.98. So I have put also 0.98 on my > results here. Basically, as I said yesterday, no negativ perf impact for > 0.94.21. Each test run 10 times (except the last 4) and I remove the 2 > extremes. > > JM > > > 0.94.200.94.21 0.98.2FilteredScanTest 0,230,22 0,25RandomReadTest 808815 > 1 107RandomSeekScanTest 172169 201RandomScanWithRange10Test 286279 277 > RandomScanWithRange100Test 147145 161RandomScanWithRange1000Test 38,22 37,27 > 50 SequentialReadTest1 217 1 1991 392 SequentialWriteTest13 732 13 39119 455 > RandomWriteTest14 091 13 64219 708 GaussianRandomReadBenchmark9 404 9 435 > 10 777 SequentialReadBenchmark2 938 638 3 074 8153 335 239 > SequentialWriteBenchmark912 469 913 573833 654 UniformRandomReadBenchmark > 10 299 10 35811 762 UniformRandomSmallScan233 583 234 083277 850 > LoadTestToolreal 19m30.113s > user 37m12.300s > sys 11m19.224s real 19m26.099s > user 36m1.740s > sys 11m41.704sreal 14m40.709s > user 28m56.892s > sys 12m6.364sIntegrationTestLoadAnVerify real 4m11.269s > user 1m32.904s > sys 0m7.176s real 4m7.288s > user 1m31.704s > sys 0m6.780sreal 2m38.295s > user 1m24.500s > sys 0m6.036sHLogPerformanceEvaluation 10431,988 10629,025n/a > IntegrationTestBigLinkedListreal 6m0.125s > user 3m0.004s > sys 0m11.312s real 6m17.616s > user 2m58.684s > sys 0m10.492S real 9m9.284s > user 3m31.576s > sys 0m19.828s > > > 2014-07-02 21:22 GMT-04:00 Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[email protected]>: > >> So far performances are similar to 0.94.21. So green from my side too. I >> will post detailed results later tonight or tomorrow morning. >> >> JM >> >> >> 2014-07-02 18:29 GMT-04:00 lars hofhansl <[email protected]>: >> >> Thanks Ted & Andy. >>> With my +1 we have the required 3 binding votes, will release 0.94.21 >>> tomorrow. >>> >>> -- Lars >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Ted Yu <[email protected]> >>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2014 1:25 PM >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 1st hbase 0.94.21 release candidate is available >>> for download >>> >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> Checked md5 sum >>> Checked signature >>> Apache RAT check passes. >>> Unit test suite passed (using jdk 1.7.0_25) >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> MD5 sum is good >>>> Signature is good >>>> Unpacked tarball, structure looks good. >>>> Ran Apache RAT, check passed**. >>>> Local compile and build was successful (with 7u60) >>>> Unit test suite passes 10 times out of 10 >>>> Ran LoadTestTool, no errors, logs look good. >>>> >>>> ** - You have to remove docs/ and generated web.xml files under >>>> hbase-webapps/ first. Going forward I think we should release a source >>> only >>>> tarball and a second -bin "binary convenience" artifact. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 2:20 PM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> The 1st 0.94.21 RC is available for download at >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.21-rc0/ >>>>> Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328 >>>>> >>>>> 0.94 development is continuing to wind down, HBase 0.94.21 is a small >>> bug >>>>> fix release with 9 fixes: >>>>> [HBASE-10692] - The Multi TableMap job don't support the security >>>>> HBase cluster >>>>> [HBASE-11052] - Sending random data crashes thrift service >>>>> [HBASE-11096] - stop method of Master and RegionServer >>> coprocessor is >>>>> not invoked >>>>> [HBASE-11234] - FastDiffDeltaEncoder#getFirstKeyInBlock returns >>> wrong >>>>> result >>>>> [HBASE-11341] - ZKProcedureCoordinatorRpcs should respond only to >>>>> members >>>>> [HBASE-11414] - Backport to 0.94: HBASE-7711 rowlock release >>> problem >>>>> with thread interruptions in batchMutate >>>>> [HBASE-8495] - Change ownership of the directory to bulk load >>>>> [HBASE-10871] - Indefinite OPEN/CLOSE wait on busy RegionServers >>>>> [HBASE-10935] - support snapshot policy where flush memstore can >>> be >>>>> skipped to prevent production cluster freeze >>>>> >>>>> The list of changes is also available here: >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12326794 >>>>> >>>>> Here's the test run for this RC: >>>>> https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94.21/30/ >>>>> >>>>> Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin, etc, and >>>>> vote +1/-1 by EOD July 3rd on whether we should release this as >>> 0.94.21. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks. >>>>> >>>>> -- Lars >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> - Andy >>>> >>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein >>>> (via Tom White) >> >>
