bq. disabled Nagle's True. See HBASE-7008
Cheers On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 8:32 AM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: > Note that in order to compare apples to apples the instances should be > configured the same. > 0.98 increases the block cache to 40% by default, enables scanner caching > by default, and disabled Nagle's (I think). > The same config changes should be done to 0.94 (unless we truly want to > compare the out of the box configurations). > > > -- Lars > > > > ________________________________ > From: Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[email protected]> > To: dev <[email protected]>; lars hofhansl <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2014 6:10 AM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 1st hbase 0.94.21 release candidate is available > for download > > > > Here are the perfs tests results. Someone on the user list asked few days > ago about perfs between 0.94 and 0.98. So I have put also 0.98 on my > results here. Basically, as I said yesterday, no negativ perf impact for > 0.94.21. Each test run 10 times (except the last 4) and I remove the 2 > extremes. > > JM > > > > 0.94.20 0.94.21 0.98.2 > FilteredScanTest 0,23 0,22 0,25 > RandomReadTest 808 815 1 107 > RandomSeekScanTest 172 169 201 > RandomScanWithRange10Test 286 279 277 > RandomScanWithRange100Test 147 145 161 > RandomScanWithRange1000Test 38,22 37,27 50 > SequentialReadTest 1 217 1 199 1 392 > SequentialWriteTest 13 732 13 391 19 455 > RandomWriteTest 14 091 13 642 19 708 > GaussianRandomReadBenchmark 9 404 9 435 10 777 > SequentialReadBenchmark 2 938 638 3 074 815 3 335 239 > SequentialWriteBenchmark 912 469 913 573 833 654 > UniformRandomReadBenchmark 10 299 10 358 11 762 > UniformRandomSmallScan 233 583 234 083 277 850 > LoadTestTool real 19m30.113s > user 37m12.300s > sys 11m19.224s real 19m26.099s > user 36m1.740s > sys 11m41.704s real 14m40.709s > user 28m56.892s > sys 12m6.364s > IntegrationTestLoadAnVerify real 4m11.269s > user 1m32.904s > sys 0m7.176s real 4m7.288s > user 1m31.704s > sys 0m6.780s real 2m38.295s > user 1m24.500s > sys 0m6.036s > HLogPerformanceEvaluation 10431,988 10629,025 n/a > IntegrationTestBigLinkedList real 6m0.125s > user 3m0.004s > sys 0m11.312s real 6m17.616s > user 2m58.684s > sys 0m10.492S real 9m9.284s > user 3m31.576s > sys 0m19.828s > > > > > 2014-07-02 21:22 GMT-04:00 Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[email protected]>: > > > > So far performances are similar to 0.94.21. So green from my side too. I > will post detailed results later tonight or tomorrow morning. > > > >JM > > > > > > > > > >2014-07-02 18:29 GMT-04:00 lars hofhansl <[email protected]>: > > > > > >Thanks Ted & Andy. > >>With my +1 we have the required 3 binding votes, will release 0.94.21 > tomorrow. > >> > >>-- Lars > >> > >> > >> > >>________________________________ > >> From: Ted Yu <[email protected]> > >>To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > >>Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2014 1:25 PM > >> > >>Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 1st hbase 0.94.21 release candidate is available > for download > >> > >> > >> > >>+1 > >> > >>Checked md5 sum > >>Checked signature > >>Apache RAT check passes. > >>Unit test suite passed (using jdk 1.7.0_25) > >> > >>Cheers > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> MD5 sum is good > >>> Signature is good > >>> Unpacked tarball, structure looks good. > >>> Ran Apache RAT, check passed**. > >>> Local compile and build was successful (with 7u60) > >>> Unit test suite passes 10 times out of 10 > >>> Ran LoadTestTool, no errors, logs look good. > >>> > >>> ** - You have to remove docs/ and generated web.xml files under > >>> hbase-webapps/ first. Going forward I think we should release a source > only > >>> tarball and a second -bin "binary convenience" artifact. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 2:20 PM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> > The 1st 0.94.21 RC is available for download at > >>> > http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.21-rc0/ > >>> > Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328 > >>> > > >>> > 0.94 development is continuing to wind down, HBase 0.94.21 is a > small bug > >>> > fix release with 9 fixes: > >>> > [HBASE-10692] - The Multi TableMap job don't support the security > >>> > HBase cluster > >>> > [HBASE-11052] - Sending random data crashes thrift service > >>> > [HBASE-11096] - stop method of Master and RegionServer > coprocessor is > >>> > not invoked > >>> > [HBASE-11234] - FastDiffDeltaEncoder#getFirstKeyInBlock returns > wrong > >>> > result > >>> > [HBASE-11341] - ZKProcedureCoordinatorRpcs should respond only to > >>> > members > >>> > [HBASE-11414] - Backport to 0.94: HBASE-7711 rowlock release > problem > >>> > with thread interruptions in batchMutate > >>> > [HBASE-8495] - Change ownership of the directory to bulk load > >>> > [HBASE-10871] - Indefinite OPEN/CLOSE wait on busy RegionServers > >>> > [HBASE-10935] - support snapshot policy where flush memstore can > be > >>> > skipped to prevent production cluster freeze > >>> > > >>> > The list of changes is also available here: > >>> > > >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12326794 > >>> > > >>> > Here's the test run for this RC: > >>> > https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94.21/30/ > >>> > > >>> > Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin, etc, > and > >>> > vote +1/-1 by EOD July 3rd on whether we should release this as > 0.94.21. > >>> > > >>> > Thanks. > >>> > > >>> > -- Lars > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Best regards, > >>> > >>> - Andy > >>> > >>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > Hein > >>> (via Tom White) > >>> > > >
