I'm not arguing for one way only. I'd like to be able to see who committed the patch when looking at the log. If people think this is too much to ask I will deal with it.
> On Aug 1, 2014, at 1:36 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> If you look over git history, our current process is committer is Author >> and contributor name is added in parenthesis at the end of the first line >> of the commit message. No additional process is needed, nor changes to >> local configuration, if we stick to this practice. > Yes. We should continue to do this. > > I'm looking for license to also commit patches doing 'git am --signoff' > when the contributor has taken the time to do a nice write up on what is in > their contrib. > > Or should we have one way only? > > St.Ack
