You may have Hadoop related setup issues, given the tests are failing as
errors and these are all mapreduce minicluster test failures. The mapreduce
tests have been passing for me on various EC2 instances throughout the
​0.98​
.6 dev cycle
​on
 JDK 6
​, 7, and 8 (though I only tested on 8 once last week)
. I also ran TestRowCounter and TestImportExport on my dev box right now
with JDK 7 and they both passed.
​​If you can pastebin the full test output from one of the erroring
mapreduce tests that might be helpful.


Like Ted I think the TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistributedLogReplay failure
is potentially interesting.
​ Could we look at the full test output of that?​


On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Here you go: http://pastebin.com/LH8cPTkp
>
> Ran 12 times. 4 different hosts, with JDK6 to 8.
>
> All 8 failed the same way. Passed only once with JDK7.
>
> I will try with -X to find the details but will focus on JDK7 on a single
> host for now.
>
> JM
>
>
> 2014-08-28 20:10 GMT-04:00 Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[email protected]>:
>
> > I will re-spin on the 3 servers tonight, using the command you gave, and
> > report here. 0.94.23 passed on them.
> > Le 2014-08-28 19:50, "Andrew Purtell" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> >> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I tried the test suite with JDK6, 7 and 8 on 3 different servers and
> it
> >> > failed with all. Did I missed something? Is there a new command line
> to
> >> > start the tests?
> >> >
> >>
> >> That's worrying
> >>
> >> 'mvn test' didn't work for you?
> >>
> >> Typically to get a clean result I do 'git checkout -f 0.98 && git clean
> >> -df
> >>  && mvn -DskipTests clean install && mvn test'
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> >> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > somewhere it's a good news for me ;) Will give more time.
> >> >
> >> > I tried the test suite with JDK6, 7 and 8 on 3 different servers and
> it
> >> > failed with all. Did I missed something? Is there a new command line
> to
> >> > start the tests?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2014-08-28 19:04 GMT-04:00 Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>:
> >> >
> >> > > -1
> >> > >
> >> > > See HBASE-11857. We should not release something known to not be
> >> > compatible
> >> > > with Phoenix. I made that a blocker for 0.98.6.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Andrew Purtell <
> [email protected]>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > The 1st HBase 0.98.
> >> > > > ​6
> >> > > >  release candidate (RC0) is available for download at
> >> > > > http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.6RC0/ and Maven artifacts
> >> are
> >> > > > also available in the temporary repository
> >> > > >
> >> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1032/
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12327376
> >> > > > ​
> >> > > >
> >> > > > This ​candidate contains a significant backported change, ZK-less
> >> > region
> >> > > > assignment (HBASE-11546), thanks to the heavy lifting of Virag
> >> Kothari
> >> > > (and
> >> > > > original contributors Jimmy Xiang and Virag Kothari). The new code
> >> will
> >> > > not
> >> > > > be active unless the configuration setting "
> >> > > > hbase.assignment.usezk" is set to '
> >> > > > ​false
> >> > > > '.
> >> > > > ​If possible please consider testing with this configuration
> change
> >> on
> >> > a
> >> > > > cluster and/or with the integration tests.​
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific
> Time
> >> > > > (00:00 -0800 GMT) on
> >> > > > ​September 2
> >> > > > on whether or not we should release this as 0.98.
> >> > > > ​6
> >> > > > . Three +1 votes from PMC will be required to release.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > Best regards,
> >> > > >
> >> > > >    - Andy
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. -
> Piet
> >> > Hein
> >> > > > (via Tom White)
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Best regards,
> >> > >
> >> > >    - Andy
> >> > >
> >> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> >> Hein
> >> > > (via Tom White)
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >>    - Andy
> >>
> >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> >> (via Tom White)
> >>
> >
>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Reply via email to