Not sure to get why I have hadoop related issues. Hadoop is running on some of the nodes where I run those tests, but on one of them it's not and I get the same error...
I will shut hadoop down on all nodes and retry... Here are the logs for testAddVisibilityLabelsOnRSRestart(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.security.visibility.TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistributedLogReplay) : http://www.spaggiari.org/hbase-0.98.6.logs Let me know if you need any other file. This is the standard output with -X. JM 2014-08-29 19:01 GMT-04:00 Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>: > You may have Hadoop related setup issues, given the tests are failing as > errors and these are all mapreduce minicluster test failures. The mapreduce > tests have been passing for me on various EC2 instances throughout the > 0.98 > .6 dev cycle > on > JDK 6 > , 7, and 8 (though I only tested on 8 once last week) > . I also ran TestRowCounter and TestImportExport on my dev box right now > with JDK 7 and they both passed. > If you can pastebin the full test output from one of the erroring > mapreduce tests that might be helpful. > > > Like Ted I think the TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistributedLogReplay failure > is potentially interesting. > Could we look at the full test output of that? > > > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Here you go: http://pastebin.com/LH8cPTkp > > > > Ran 12 times. 4 different hosts, with JDK6 to 8. > > > > All 8 failed the same way. Passed only once with JDK7. > > > > I will try with -X to find the details but will focus on JDK7 on a single > > host for now. > > > > JM > > > > > > 2014-08-28 20:10 GMT-04:00 Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[email protected] > >: > > > > > I will re-spin on the 3 servers tonight, using the command you gave, > and > > > report here. 0.94.23 passed on them. > > > Le 2014-08-28 19:50, "Andrew Purtell" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > > >> [email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >> > I tried the test suite with JDK6, 7 and 8 on 3 different servers and > > it > > >> > failed with all. Did I missed something? Is there a new command line > > to > > >> > start the tests? > > >> > > > >> > > >> That's worrying > > >> > > >> 'mvn test' didn't work for you? > > >> > > >> Typically to get a clean result I do 'git checkout -f 0.98 && git > clean > > >> -df > > >> && mvn -DskipTests clean install && mvn test' > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > > >> [email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >> > somewhere it's a good news for me ;) Will give more time. > > >> > > > >> > I tried the test suite with JDK6, 7 and 8 on 3 different servers and > > it > > >> > failed with all. Did I missed something? Is there a new command line > > to > > >> > start the tests? > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > 2014-08-28 19:04 GMT-04:00 Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>: > > >> > > > >> > > -1 > > >> > > > > >> > > See HBASE-11857. We should not release something known to not be > > >> > compatible > > >> > > with Phoenix. I made that a blocker for 0.98.6. > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Andrew Purtell < > > [email protected]> > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > > The 1st HBase 0.98. > > >> > > > 6 > > >> > > > release candidate (RC0) is available for download at > > >> > > > http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.6RC0/ and Maven > artifacts > > >> are > > >> > > > also available in the temporary repository > > >> > > > > > >> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1032/ > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > The issues resolved in this release can be found here: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12327376 > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > This candidate contains a significant backported change, > ZK-less > > >> > region > > >> > > > assignment (HBASE-11546), thanks to the heavy lifting of Virag > > >> Kothari > > >> > > (and > > >> > > > original contributors Jimmy Xiang and Virag Kothari). The new > code > > >> will > > >> > > not > > >> > > > be active unless the configuration setting " > > >> > > > hbase.assignment.usezk" is set to ' > > >> > > > false > > >> > > > '. > > >> > > > If possible please consider testing with this configuration > > change > > >> on > > >> > a > > >> > > > cluster and/or with the integration tests. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific > > Time > > >> > > > (00:00 -0800 GMT) on > > >> > > > September 2 > > >> > > > on whether or not we should release this as 0.98. > > >> > > > 6 > > >> > > > . Three +1 votes from PMC will be required to release. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > -- > > >> > > > Best regards, > > >> > > > > > >> > > > - Andy > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - > > Piet > > >> > Hein > > >> > > > (via Tom White) > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > -- > > >> > > Best regards, > > >> > > > > >> > > - Andy > > >> > > > > >> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - > Piet > > >> Hein > > >> > > (via Tom White) > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Best regards, > > >> > > >> - Andy > > >> > > >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > Hein > > >> (via Tom White) > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) >
