I agree as well. On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:30 AM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I think we should change this so this is NOT the default in 1.0. What do > folks think? > > I agree 100%. That will lead to... uhm... surprises. > > -- Lars > > > > ________________________________ > From: Stack <[email protected]> > To: HBase Dev List <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 10:02 AM > Subject: Re: First release candidate for HBase 0.99.0 (RC0) is available. > Please vote by 09/17/2014 > > > Thanks for doing the helpful writeup Enis. It helps doing evaluation. > > I have one question below. > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:56 AM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> wrote: > ... > > > > > Starting with 0.99.0, the HBase master server and backup master servers > > will > > also act as a region server. RPC port and info port for web UI is shared > > for > > the master and region server roles. Active master will be hosting the > meta > > table (and other hbase system tables, acl and namespace) by default > > (unless configured otherwise). The master and backup masters will not be > > hosting user level regions. See HBASE-10569 and HBASE-11604 for more > > details. > > > > I think we should change this so this is NOT the default in 1.0. What do > folks think? The new deploy topology will surprise going from earlier > version. Better folks enable it explicitly*? > St.Ack > > * I used to be in favor of this feature being on by default but I have > since changed my mind given how I see meta hosting evolving in the > near-future. >
