Yeah, it will be even more confusing for having colocation on for 0.99.0, but off for 0.99.1 and 1.0.
Let me spin up another RC today, and do a 3 day vote. Enis On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 1:06 PM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: > I think HBASE-11604 warrants a new RC. Maybe in a dev release we could be > more relaxed about this, would still be confusing for folks who play with > this the first time, see the changed the behavior, and then they play again > and it's back to what it was before. > > -- Lars > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Stack <[email protected]> > To: HBase Dev List <[email protected]> > Cc: > Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 9:15 AM > Subject: Re: First release candidate for HBase 0.99.0 (RC0) is available. > Please vote by 09/17/2014 > > On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Ok, > > > > Let me sink this RC, and spin another quick one containing HBASE-11604. > > Will do tomorrow. > > > > > You don't want to just fix in a 0.99.1? > > > > > Should I wait for HBASE-11967? > > > > > I'd say no. Non-critical. Takes some work to repro. We've had this > problem always it seems. > > St.Ack > > > > > > > > > Enis > > > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Andrew Purtell < > [email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > I agree it would be surprising to have masters running RegionServers > and > > > hosting regions. Maybe we can take that kind of departure for 2.0? (Or > > even > > > 1.1?) It's not clear what state that will end up in. Default-on > features > > in > > > 1.0 should carry forward and promote stability and familiarity? > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 11, 2014, at 10:02 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Thanks for doing the helpful writeup Enis. It helps doing evaluation. > > > > > > > > I have one question below. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:56 AM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > ... > > > > > > > >> > > > >> Starting with 0.99.0, the HBase master server and backup master > > servers > > > >> will > > > >> also act as a region server. RPC port and info port for web UI is > > shared > > > >> for > > > >> the master and region server roles. Active master will be hosting > the > > > meta > > > >> table (and other hbase system tables, acl and namespace) by default > > > >> (unless configured otherwise). The master and backup masters will > not > > be > > > >> hosting user level regions. See HBASE-10569 and HBASE-11604 for more > > > >> details. > > > > > > > > I think we should change this so this is NOT the default in 1.0. What > > do > > > > folks think? The new deploy topology will surprise going from > earlier > > > > version. Better folks enable it explicitly*? > > > > St.Ack > > > > > > > > * I used to be in favor of this feature being on by default but I > have > > > > since changed my mind given how I see meta hosting evolving in the > > > > near-future. > > > > > >
