On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think we can manage. The nice thing about on demand minors is what > emerges will be driven by actual need. For example after we move up from > 0.98 to 1.x, I might want to RM a minor line that corresponds to our > production. Someone working for a vendor might be RMing a minor line > corresponding to the latest release. The number of active lines will be > bounded by the level of available interest and effort in maintaining them. > > Agree. Patch releases on roughly monthly would be sweet. I think a 'natural' minor cadence will emerge. 2.0 in 6 months or 6 years? St.Ack
