Not 6 years :-) On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I think we can manage. The nice thing about on demand minors is what > > emerges will be driven by actual need. For example after we move up from > > 0.98 to 1.x, I might want to RM a minor line that corresponds to our > > production. Someone working for a vendor might be RMing a minor line > > corresponding to the latest release. The number of active lines will be > > bounded by the level of available interest and effort in maintaining > them. > > > > > Agree. Patch releases on roughly monthly would be sweet. I think a > 'natural' minor cadence will emerge. > > 2.0 in 6 months or 6 years? > > St.Ack > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
