Hi Vlad, We have not even considered bans of any kind prior to this day.
Apache mail can be fickle sometimes. Please try resending if there's a discussion you would like to start. I'll watch for anything of yours that may turn up in the moderator queue for some reason. On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Vladimir Rodionov <[email protected]> wrote: > Apologize for off-top, but jumping in with my question into other > discussion is the only way I can > ask the question (see below). > > Have I been banned recently from opening discussions on dev list :) ? I can > join any discussion, except my own ... For some reasons, Apache mail > server ignores me in this case. > > Or its just a bug? > > -Vlad > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I volunteer to help moderate. > > St.Ack > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > (I took the liberty of moving us off of Ted's feature discussion > thread) > > > > > > A three month ban sounds better than a permanent ban. But it still > seems > > > likely to just result in the ban-ee walking away from teh community or > > > escalating. > > > > > > Would we consider enforcing moderation on posts for the three month > > period > > > instead of an outright ban? > > > > > > It's more work for whomever has moderator rights on the mailing list, > but > > > it provides a better feedback cycle for improved behavior. Presuming > > that I > > > don't already have such access as a PMC member, I'd be willing to > > volunteer > > > to help take on part of the burden. > > > > > > -Sean > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > It was suggested privately that we try a temporary ban first, to be > > clear > > > > that current behavior and communication is unacceptable and won't be > > > > tolerated further, yet allow for the possibility of a return to the > > > > community should the message be received. So let me amend my proposal > > - a > > > > three month temporary ban. > > > > > > > > Also, the reason I am asking for public feedback before calling for a > > > vote > > > > is this would be the first time in the history of the project we > would > > > take > > > > this very unfortunate step. It pains me personally but enough is > > enough, > > > in > > > > my opinion. However, if you are not comfortable with that then please > > > speak > > > > up and I won't ask the PMC to vote on this. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Andrew Purtell < > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I've had enough and would like to ask the user and dev communities > if > > > > they > > > > > would mind if we vote on a permanent ban of Michael Segal - any and > > all > > > > > email accounts he may choose to set up - from all HBase mailing > > lists. > > > > The > > > > > basic lack of courtesy and constant naysaying is corrosive. Nobody > > > trying > > > > > to volunteer their time here deserves his continuing abuse. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Michael Segel < > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Sean, > > > > >> > > > > >> You’re a developer, or just some higher level primate that pounds > > > code? > > > > >> > > > > >> I don’t want to embarrass you, but what do they teach in > engineering > > > > >> schools these days? > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > - Andy > > > > > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > > Hein > > > > (via Tom White) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Sean > > > > > > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
