I would like to see the same things I asked for MOB: Functional, stability, and performance tests focused on the impact of the feature on those who don't want it. Can use the usual suspects: PE, LTT, YCSB, our ITs. Given how 6721 has been implemented I suspect favorable results will be easy to obtain.
I think we would like to see a backport to branch-1 because we will be bringing our production up to a 1.x soon. Its fair to consider a backport to 0.98 but as RM for that branch I'd like to see it go into branch-1 first and also have a case where the result will go into someone's production. On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Francis Liu <tof...@ymail.com.invalid> wrote: > Hi, > HBASE-6721 is now committed to trunk. It'd be great if it can be > backported to 1.x and 0.98 so that we can use it internally as well as push > up features and fixes. We have been running an internal version for around > 4 years. There's seems to be interest (HW, Bloomberg, Salesforce, etc). > Also given how modular the code is. There's barely any effect in existing > code paths. > Seeding the criteria with Andy's suggestions in jira: > 1. Stability - Unit tests and ?2. functional3. Performance - Read/write > path was not affected. Some small changes related to assignment. > Thanks, > Francis > > > > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
