I'm not aware of any, and changes made to 1.3 shouldn't render 2.4 unsupportable.
On the second thought, if we want to have to maintain less minor releases in 1.* line and encourage folks to update, we need to keep maintaining those Hadoop versions, yeah. Let's leave 2.4 as supported. -Mikhail On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Mikhail Antonov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > I'm thinking to move Hadoop 2.4.* from Supported to Not Tested, to kind > of > > encourage people to move and have less versions to test. How many people > > want to stick with Hadoop 2.4 yet upgrade to HBase 1.3? > > > > Hadoop 2.4 is still considered a "safe bet" stable release for those > in LTM mode. > > Our compatibility guidelines say that we won't force an incompatible > dependency > upgrade in a minor version. Do we know if Hadoop 2.4 -> 2.5 includes any > documented incompatibilities? > > -- > busbey > -- Thanks, Michael Antonov
