If Hadoop shades their protobuf that should keep any altering they do from impacting us, right?
-- Sean Busbey On Jul 9, 2016 3:02 PM, "Andrew Purtell" <[email protected]> wrote: > PB3 sounds like a plan for 2.0 but what about all shipping versions. > > > On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The plan in HBASE-15638 is to shade our protobuf so we are independent of > > anyone else's protobuf and so we can move on to one of our choosing or > even > > check in our own protobuf if we have to (protobuf is lacking in support > for > > offheap). Anoop and Ram are thinking we should go to pb3. I'll let them > > talk of the testing they have done so far. > > > > St.Ack > > > > On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > We should look at HBASE-15638 again in light of HADOOP-13363. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Best regards, > > > > > > - Andy > > > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > Hein > > > (via Tom White) > > > > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) >
