I would think so yes
> On Jul 11, 2016, at 7:31 AM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote: > > If Hadoop shades their protobuf that should keep any altering they do from > impacting us, right? > > -- > Sean Busbey >> On Jul 9, 2016 3:02 PM, "Andrew Purtell" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> PB3 sounds like a plan for 2.0 but what about all shipping versions. >> >> >>> On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> The plan in HBASE-15638 is to shade our protobuf so we are independent of >>> anyone else's protobuf and so we can move on to one of our choosing or >> even >>> check in our own protobuf if we have to (protobuf is lacking in support >> for >>> offheap). Anoop and Ram are thinking we should go to pb3. I'll let them >>> talk of the testing they have done so far. >>> >>> St.Ack >>> >>> On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> We should look at HBASE-15638 again in light of HADOOP-13363. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> - Andy >>>> >>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet >> Hein >>>> (via Tom White) >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> >> - Andy >> >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein >> (via Tom White) >>
