Hi Yu, sorry I missed that and thanks for reaching out. Let me have a look now and comment on the jira.
-Mikhail On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:30 AM, Yu Li <[email protected]> wrote: > I think HBASE-16931 is also a critical issue (oops also in compaction > area...) and should go in 1.3.0, pinged several times there but failed to > draw your attention boss (smile). Mind take a look? Thanks. > > Btw, is there any ETA for 1.3.0 yet? > > Best Regards, > Yu > > On 29 October 2016 at 08:17, Mikhail Antonov <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Guys, > > > > I've been working on getting the first RC out this week and want to share > > an update on the current state of the things. > > > > - HBASE-16951 - was found and fixed, when we don't include > > hbase-archetypes in the tarball assembly > > - HBASE-16570 - optimization that caused a regression in the balancer, > it > > was reverted from 1.3. Once fixed that would go to 1.4 and perhaps 1.3.1. > > - HBASE-16743 - flaky TestSimpleRpcScheduler, fixed now (I ran several > > cycles of 50 iterations each and all have passed). > > > > Now, there's presently one remaining blocker - HBASE-16964, when we don't > > properly handle archiving of store files after compactions (thanks Gary > for > > digging into that!). > > See the jira for details. > > > > Also, as a note - the above is a third major bug around compactions that > we > > saw on 1.3 during our testing last month (see also HBASE-16788 > > and HBASE-16754).. > > So during the upcoming RC testing let's try to stress this area. > > > > Until 1.3 is out let's consider branch-1.3 to be in a lockdown for new > > changes. Ping me if you think there is something that I'm missing that > > should go out in 1.3. Otherwise, > > important but non-blocker fixes in flight would go in 1.3.1. > > > > Stay tuned! > > Mikhail > > > -- Thanks, Michael Antonov
