Looking - thanks!

-M

On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Yu Li <[email protected]> wrote:

> Another critical one for your attention sir (patch ready for commit):
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16960
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
> On 31 October 2016 at 16:59, Mikhail Antonov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Yu,
> >
> > sorry I missed that and thanks for reaching out. Let me have a look now
> and
> > comment on the jira.
> >
> > -Mikhail
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:30 AM, Yu Li <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > I think HBASE-16931 is also a critical issue (oops also in compaction
> > > area...) and should go in 1.3.0, pinged several times there but failed
> to
> > > draw your attention boss (smile). Mind take a look? Thanks.
> > >
> > > Btw, is there any ETA for 1.3.0 yet?
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Yu
> > >
> > > On 29 October 2016 at 08:17, Mikhail Antonov <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Guys,
> > > >
> > > > I've been working on getting the first RC out this week and want to
> > share
> > > > an update on the current state of the things.
> > > >
> > > >  - HBASE-16951 - was found and fixed, when we don't include
> > > > hbase-archetypes in the tarball assembly
> > > >  - HBASE-16570 - optimization that caused a regression in the
> balancer,
> > > it
> > > > was reverted from 1.3. Once fixed that would go to 1.4 and perhaps
> > 1.3.1.
> > > >  - HBASE-16743 - flaky TestSimpleRpcScheduler, fixed now (I ran
> several
> > > > cycles of 50 iterations each and all have passed).
> > > >
> > > > Now, there's presently one remaining blocker - HBASE-16964, when we
> > don't
> > > > properly handle archiving of store files after compactions (thanks
> Gary
> > > for
> > > > digging into that!).
> > > > See the jira for details.
> > > >
> > > > Also, as a note - the above is a third major bug around compactions
> > that
> > > we
> > > > saw on 1.3 during our testing last month (see also HBASE-16788
> > > > and HBASE-16754)..
> > > > So during the upcoming RC testing let's try to stress this area.
> > > >
> > > > Until 1.3 is out let's consider branch-1.3 to be in a lockdown for
> new
> > > > changes. Ping me if you think there is something that I'm missing
> that
> > > > should go out in 1.3. Otherwise,
> > > > important but non-blocker fixes in flight would go in 1.3.1.
> > > >
> > > > Stay tuned!
> > > > Mikhail
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > Michael Antonov
> >
>



-- 
Thanks,
Michael Antonov

Reply via email to