All right, I cherry picked HBASE-17227 and the first RC is out. Thanks Andrew for the help pushing it!
-Mikhail On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Mikhail Antonov <olorinb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Andrew! > > So after open jiras has been re-targeted for 1.3.2 and looking at the > filter > `affectedVersion in (1.3.0) AND fixVersion = 1.3.2 AND status in (Open, > "Patch Available", Reopened, "In Progress")` > > there are only few issues that warrant discussion before RC0, I think. > > - HBASE-17513, where Thrift-1 security settings are easy to misconfigure. > Currently marked critical, I don't think it's release blocker. Opinions? > - HBASE-17227, a backport of HBASE-17206, a stability fix for FSHLog. > This one I think we should pull in. > > Everything else isn't important enough for an RC. > > Any opinions? Otherwise I'd cherry pick the latter one. > > -Mikhail > > > On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> Branch 1.3 updated and tagged for RC0. >> >> remote: hbase git commit: Update POMs and CHANGES.txt for 1.3.1 RC0 >> To https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/hbase.git >> fd297e2..3a2f3aa branch-1.3 -> branch-1.3 >> * [new tag] 1.3.1RC0 -> 1.3.1RC0 >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 10:35 PM, Mikhail Antonov <olorinb...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > I've been planning to cut an RC for 1.3.1 for some time, apologize for >> the >> > delay here. I'm going to go over outstanding jiras tomorrow, >> > I think there are still few issues waiting for backports. >> > >> > Andrew - appreciate your offer! I have started preparations for 1.3.1 >> > release, but any help with triaging changes, API compatibility tests >> > and general release testing would definitely be helpful. >> > >> > Thanks! >> > -Mikhail >> > >> > On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 9:52 PM, Andrew Purtell < >> andrew.purt...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > I'd be happy to RM 1.3.1 unless someone already has it waiting in the >> > > wings. >> > > >> > > >> > > > On Apr 3, 2017, at 5:43 PM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org> >> > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > Hello, >> > > > We'd like to start supporting releases of Phoenix that work with the >> > > HBase >> > > > 1.3 branch, but there's a committed fix on which we rely >> (HBASE-17587) >> > > for >> > > > Phoenix to function correctly. Is there a time frame for an HBase >> 1.3.1 >> > > > release? >> > > > Thanks, >> > > > James >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Thanks, >> > Michael Antonov >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> >> - Andy >> >> If you are given a choice, you believe you have acted freely. - Raymond >> Teller (via Peter Watts) >> > > > > -- > Thanks, > Michael Antonov > -- Thanks, Michael Antonov
