Ok, thanks.

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote:

> Okay, so rephrasing.
>
> I'd rather not mark 1.3.0 as the stable release since HBASE-17069 is in the
> current stable pointer (1.2.5) and hasn't been fixed in a 1.3.z release
> line version yet.
>
> I think we should revisit the question if and when there's a 1.3.1 release.
>
> -busbey
>
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:53 PM Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > I can't ask about 1.3.1 (and neither can you Ted) because 1.3.1 is not
> > released yet. I need to bring this up now because I made a provisional
> > remark on the board report about 1.3.0. If possible let's keep this on
> > topic. Thanks.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Release 1.3.1 seems to have high chance of passing.
> > >
> > > How about using 1.3.1 as stable release ?
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Shall we move the 'stable' pointer for HBase in dist.apache.org to
> > > release
> > > > 1.3.0 ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > >    - Andy
> > > >
> > > > If you are given a choice, you believe you have acted freely. -
> Raymond
> > > > Teller (via Peter Watts)
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >    - Andy
> >
> > If you are given a choice, you believe you have acted freely. - Raymond
> > Teller (via Peter Watts)
> >
>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

If you are given a choice, you believe you have acted freely. - Raymond
Teller (via Peter Watts)

Reply via email to