Yeah, I also would prefer to wait until 1.3.1 is released. On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ok, thanks. > > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Okay, so rephrasing. > > > > I'd rather not mark 1.3.0 as the stable release since HBASE-17069 is in > the > > current stable pointer (1.2.5) and hasn't been fixed in a 1.3.z release > > line version yet. > > > > I think we should revisit the question if and when there's a 1.3.1 > release. > > > > -busbey > > > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:53 PM Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > I can't ask about 1.3.1 (and neither can you Ted) because 1.3.1 is not > > > released yet. I need to bring this up now because I made a provisional > > > remark on the board report about 1.3.0. If possible let's keep this on > > > topic. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Release 1.3.1 seems to have high chance of passing. > > > > > > > > How about using 1.3.1 as stable release ? > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Andrew Purtell < > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Shall we move the 'stable' pointer for HBase in dist.apache.org to > > > > release > > > > > 1.3.0 ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > - Andy > > > > > > > > > > If you are given a choice, you believe you have acted freely. - > > Raymond > > > > > Teller (via Peter Watts) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Best regards, > > > > > > - Andy > > > > > > If you are given a choice, you believe you have acted freely. - Raymond > > > Teller (via Peter Watts) > > > > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > If you are given a choice, you believe you have acted freely. - Raymond > Teller (via Peter Watts) > -- Thanks, Michael Antonov
