Gotcha, sorry for the noise. I documented properly in the upcoming HBase book. 
:)

Sent from my iPhone

> On 7. Aug 2017, at 07:02, ramkrishna vasudevan 
> <ramkrishna.s.vasude...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I think the layout of tags is missing now in the javadoc. May be it got
> missed or moved to some other place?
> I remember we had a layout explaining the tag structure then this code is
> much easier to read this code.
> 
> As Chia-Ping said <tag len(short)><tag type (byte)<tag bytes> is the
> layout.
> So from the KeyValue lay out we extract the tag part which in itself has a
> tag length to represent the complete set of tags.
> 
> From the tags offset and tags length from the KV we extract individual tags
> in that KV.
> 
> For eg
> See TagUtil#asList
> 
> {code}
> List<Tag> tags = new ArrayList<>();
>    int pos = offset;
>    while (pos < offset + length) {
>      int tagLen = Bytes.readAsInt(b, pos, TAG_LENGTH_SIZE);
>      tags.add(new ArrayBackedTag(b, pos, tagLen + TAG_LENGTH_SIZE));
>      pos += TAG_LENGTH_SIZE + tagLen;
>    }
>    return tags;
> {code}
> 
> Regards
> Ram
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 3:25 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> The byte following the tag length (a short) is the tag type.
>> 
>> The current code is correct.
>> 
>> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> According to the following code:
>>>  public ArrayBackedTag(byte tagType, byte[] tag) {
>>>    int tagLength = tag.length + TYPE_LENGTH_SIZE;
>>>    if (tagLength > MAX_TAG_LENGTH) {
>>>      throw new IllegalArgumentException(
>>>          "Invalid tag data being passed. Its length can not exceed " +
>>> MAX_TAG_LENGTH);
>>>    }
>>>    length = TAG_LENGTH_SIZE + tagLength;
>>>    bytes = new byte[length];
>>>    int pos = Bytes.putAsShort(bytes, 0, tagLength);
>>>    pos = Bytes.putByte(bytes, pos, tagType);
>>>    Bytes.putBytes(bytes, pos, tag, 0, tag.length);
>>>    this.type = tagType;
>>>  }
>>> The layout of the byte array should be:
>>> |tag legnth (2 bytes)|tag type(1 byte)|tag|
>>> 
>>> It seems to me that the "bytes[offset + TYPE_LENGTH_SIZE]" is correct.
>>> 
>>>> On 2017-08-06 16:35, Lars George <lars.geo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> I found this reading through tags in 1.3, but checked in trunk as
>>>> well. There is this code:
>>>> 
>>>>  public ArrayBackedTag(byte[] bytes, int offset, int length) {
>>>>    if (length > MAX_TAG_LENGTH) {
>>>>      throw new IllegalArgumentException(
>>>>          "Invalid tag data being passed. Its length can not exceed "
>>>> + MAX_TAG_LENGTH);
>>>>    }
>>>>    this.bytes = bytes;
>>>>    this.offset = offset;
>>>>    this.length = length;
>>>>    this.type = bytes[offset + TAG_LENGTH_SIZE];
>>>>  }
>>>> 
>>>> I am concerned about the last line of the code, using the wrong
>> constant?
>>>> 
>>>>  public final static int TYPE_LENGTH_SIZE = Bytes.SIZEOF_BYTE;
>>>>  public final static int TAG_LENGTH_SIZE = Bytes.SIZEOF_SHORT;
>>>> 
>>>> Should this not read
>>>> 
>>>>    this.type = bytes[offset + TYPE_LENGTH_SIZE];
>>>> 
>>>> Would this not read the type from the wrong place in the array?
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Lars
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to