On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote:
> -1 to removing HTrace from HBase. > > Upgrade to the desired version, that would be fine. > > What you thinking Andrew? Trace is broke whether we upgrade or not. As is, we mislead. We give off the impression that hooking up hbase and hdfs via trace tells a story about request traversals when it at best you'd get a wonky view. HTrace needs work. HBase and HDFS also need work before we can suggest to our users this system is viable debugging. What you reckon Andrew? Thanks, S > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 5:54 AM, Tamas Penzes <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > As far as I know the actual integration of HTrace 3.2 into HBase is far > > from satisfying. > > > > This version of the library is old, buggy, not really maintained and the > > migration to version 4.x is quite hard ( > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14451) and looks like the > task > > is not getting much closer to the goal. > > > > This is why I think we should remove HTrace now and if we still want to > > have some art of tracing (I think it would be useful) then start it from > > the baseline. > > I have created a ticket for this task: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18601 > > The removal could be quite fast and reach version 2.0.0 too. > > > > What do you all think? > > > > Thanks, Tamaas > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Andrew > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's > decrepit hands > - A23, Crosstalk >
