On 12/4/17 11:43 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote:
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Josh Elser<[email protected]> wrote:
Makes sense to me.
*soapbox* I think focusing onhttps://issues.apache.org/jira
/browse/HBASE-14850 would be a better use of time than trying to
revitalize the old stuff (which I assume has begun to rot).
Is the code under hbase-native-client not the same as that referenced by
HBASE-14850? The patches on said ticket's children land code under the same
path.
That's correct -- separate "efforts". The stuff Andrew is proposing to
remove is an older client that wasn't (best I can tell) based on
Folly/Wangle like the 14850 stuff is.
