Hey Duo,
It's in a general state of DML usability -- you can read and write to
tables. Enis was a big driving force behind this and can probably speak
to more specific questions if you have them.
There are some areas which are still lacking, most notably DDL
operations are not yet implemented. I got involved a little bit to clean
up the build -- some coworkers really helped out and got us moved over
to CMake which really helps folks get up to speed without issue.
I would love to find the time to truly get into the development, but I'm
afraid I'm already stretched pretty thin just trying to keep up with the
2.0 work.
On 12/5/17 8:23 PM, 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
Oh, it should be 'silence for months'...
2017-12-06 6:40 GMT+08:00 张铎(Duo Zhang) <[email protected]>:
Hi Josh, not related to this thread but seems the HBASE-14850 branch has
been silence for silence. What's the current status of the native client
project?
Thanks.
2017-12-06 2:45 GMT+08:00 Josh Elser <[email protected]>:
On 12/4/17 11:43 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote:
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Josh Elser<[email protected]> wrote:
Makes sense to me.
*soapbox* I think focusing onhttps://issues.apache.org/jira
/browse/HBASE-14850 would be a better use of time than trying to
revitalize the old stuff (which I assume has begun to rot).
Is the code under hbase-native-client not the same as that referenced by
HBASE-14850? The patches on said ticket's children land code under the
same
path.
That's correct -- separate "efforts". The stuff Andrew is proposing to
remove is an older client that wasn't (best I can tell) based on
Folly/Wangle like the 14850 stuff is.
