Are we going to sink this one because of Andrew's -1? If so I will wait for the next one to test it...
Le 10 janv. 2018 03 h 24, "Balazs Meszaros" <balazs.mesza...@cloudera.com> a écrit : > +1 > > - signatures, checksums OK, > - unit tests passes (8u112), > - shell works, > - load test tool also successed. > > Best regards, > Balazs > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 10:38 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Linux here. > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > > > Andrew: > > > > > > I don't see this: > > > > > > [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------- > > > [INFO] T E S T S > > > [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------- > > > [INFO] Running > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool > > > [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: > > > 4.409 s - in org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver. > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool > > > [INFO] > > > [INFO] Results: > > > [INFO] > > > [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 > > > > > > Linux and Mac. > > > > > > What you reckon sir? > > > > > > St.Ack > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > -1 > > > > > > > > Checked sums and signatures: ok > > > > RAT check passes: ok (8u144) > > > > Built from source: ok (8u144) > > > > Unit tests pass: failed (8u144), TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool always > > fails > > > > > > > > > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver. > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool > > > > can fail with OOME if not run in isolation. > > > > > > > > If run in isolation, I get > > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool. > > > > testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs(org.apache.hadoop.hbase. > > > regionserver. > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool) > > > > [ERROR] Run 1: > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs:143 > All > > > the > > > > chunks must have been cleared > > > > [ERROR] Run 2: > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs:143 > All > > > the > > > > chunks must have been cleared > > > > [ERROR] Run 3: > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs:143 > All > > > the > > > > chunks must have been cleared > > > > [ERROR] Run 4: > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs:143 > All > > > the > > > > chunks must have been cleared > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:43 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > The second release candidate for HBase 2.0.0-beta-1 is up at: > > > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0- > > beta-1-RC1/ > > > > > > > > > > Maven artifacts are available from a staging directory here: > > > > > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > > orgapachehbase-1190 > > > > > > > > > > All was signed with my key at 8ACC93D2 [1] > > > > > > > > > > I tagged the RC as 2.0.0-beta-1-RC1.5 (It took a few attempts) at > > > > > hash 4c31374a90a487e19a6ef04d7b7adba43dd92ecf > > > > > > > > > > This second RC has fix nice bug fixes over RC0 including fix for > > > failing > > > > > and flakey tests. > > > > > > > > > > hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is our first beta release. It includes all that > > was > > > in > > > > > previous alphas (new assignment manager, offheap read/write path, > > > > in-memory > > > > > compactions, etc.). The APIs and feature-set are sealed. > > > > > > > > > > hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is a not-for-production preview of hbase-2.0.0. > It > > > is > > > > > meant for devs and downstreamers to test drive and flag us if we > > messed > > > > up > > > > > on anything ahead of our rolling GAs. We are particular interested > in > > > > > hearing from Coprocessor developers. > > > > > > > > > > The list of features addressed in 2.0.0 so far can be found here > [3]. > > > > There > > > > > are thousands. The list of ~2k+ fixes in 2.0.0 exclusively can be > > found > > > > > here [4] (My JIRA JQL foo is a bit dodgy -- forgive me if > mistakes). > > > > > > > > > > I've updated our overview doc. on the state of 2.0.0 [6]. We'll do > > one > > > > more > > > > > beta before we put up our first 2.0.0 Release Candidate by the end > of > > > > > January, 2.0.0-beta-2. Its focus will be making it so users can do > a > > > > > rolling upgrade on to hbase-2.x from hbase-1.x (and any bug fixes > > found > > > > > running beta-1). Here is the list of what we have targeted so far > for > > > > > beta-2 [5]. Check it out. > > > > > > > > > > One known issue is that the User API has not been properly filtered > > so > > > it > > > > > shows more than just InterfaceAudience Public content (HBASE-19663, > > to > > > be > > > > > fixed by beta-2). > > > > > > > > > > Please take this beta for a spin. Please vote on whether it ok to > put > > > out > > > > > this RC as our first beta (Note CHANGES has not yet been updated). > > Let > > > > the > > > > > VOTE be open for 72 hours (Wednesday evening) > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Your 2.0.0 Release Manager > > > > > > > > > > 1. http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9816C7FC8ACC93D2 > > > > > 3. https://goo.gl/scYjJr > > > > > 4. https://goo.gl/dFFT8b > > > > > 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HBASE/versions/12340862 > > > > > 6. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4 > > > > > z9iEu_ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best regards, > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from > truth's > > > > decrepit hands > > > > - A23, Crosstalk > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Andrew > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's > > decrepit hands > > - A23, Crosstalk > > >
