"Remaining KVs" field in master WebUI shows negative values... Is that tracked anywhere?
2018-01-10 5:12 GMT-05:00 Jean-Marc Spaggiari <jean-m...@spaggiari.org>: > Oh, you're right! I missed it! Ok. Thanks. Will wait for the next one. > > JM > > 2018-01-10 5:00 GMT-05:00 Yu Li <car...@gmail.com>: > >> I believe this one is already sunk according to stack's reply: >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Stack <st...@duboce.net> >> Date: 10 January 2018 at 02:09 >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] The second hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is >> available for download >> To: HBase Dev List <dev@hbase.apache.org> >> >> >> Thanks Andrew. >> >> Let me work on this. >> >> RC is sunk. Will put up a new one after I address the above failure. >> >> Best Regards, >> Yu >> >> On 10 January 2018 at 17:54, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <jean-m...@spaggiari.org >> > >> wrote: >> >> > Are we going to sink this one because of Andrew's -1? >> > >> > If so I will wait for the next one to test it... >> > >> > Le 10 janv. 2018 03 h 24, "Balazs Meszaros" < >> balazs.mesza...@cloudera.com> >> > a écrit : >> > >> > > +1 >> > > >> > > - signatures, checksums OK, >> > > - unit tests passes (8u112), >> > > - shell works, >> > > - load test tool also successed. >> > > >> > > Best regards, >> > > Balazs >> > > >> > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 10:38 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > Linux here. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Andrew: >> > > > > >> > > > > I don't see this: >> > > > > >> > > > > [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------- >> > > > > [INFO] T E S T S >> > > > > [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------- >> > > > > [INFO] Running >> > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool >> > > > > [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time >> > elapsed: >> > > > > 4.409 s - in org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver. >> > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool >> > > > > [INFO] >> > > > > [INFO] Results: >> > > > > [INFO] >> > > > > [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 >> > > > > >> > > > > Linux and Mac. >> > > > > >> > > > > What you reckon sir? >> > > > > >> > > > > St.Ack >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Andrew Purtell < >> apurt...@apache.org >> > > >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > -1 >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Checked sums and signatures: ok >> > > > > > RAT check passes: ok (8u144) >> > > > > > Built from source: ok (8u144) >> > > > > > Unit tests pass: failed (8u144), TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool >> always >> > > > fails >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionser >> ver. >> > > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool >> > > > > > can fail with OOME if not run in isolation. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > If run in isolation, I get >> > > > > > >> > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestMemstoreLABWithoutP >> ool. >> > > > > > testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs(org.apache.hadoop.hbase. >> > > > > regionserver. >> > > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool) >> > > > > > [ERROR] Run 1: >> > > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLA >> Bs:143 >> > > All >> > > > > the >> > > > > > chunks must have been cleared >> > > > > > [ERROR] Run 2: >> > > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLA >> Bs:143 >> > > All >> > > > > the >> > > > > > chunks must have been cleared >> > > > > > [ERROR] Run 3: >> > > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLA >> Bs:143 >> > > All >> > > > > the >> > > > > > chunks must have been cleared >> > > > > > [ERROR] Run 4: >> > > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLA >> Bs:143 >> > > All >> > > > > the >> > > > > > chunks must have been cleared >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:43 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > The second release candidate for HBase 2.0.0-beta-1 is up at: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0- >> > > > beta-1-RC1/ >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Maven artifacts are available from a staging directory here: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >> > > > > orgapachehbase-1190 >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > All was signed with my key at 8ACC93D2 [1] >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I tagged the RC as 2.0.0-beta-1-RC1.5 (It took a few >> attempts) at >> > > > > > > hash 4c31374a90a487e19a6ef04d7b7adba43dd92ecf >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > This second RC has fix nice bug fixes over RC0 including fix >> for >> > > > > failing >> > > > > > > and flakey tests. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is our first beta release. It includes all >> > that >> > > > was >> > > > > in >> > > > > > > previous alphas (new assignment manager, offheap read/write >> path, >> > > > > > in-memory >> > > > > > > compactions, etc.). The APIs and feature-set are sealed. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is a not-for-production preview of >> > hbase-2.0.0. >> > > It >> > > > > is >> > > > > > > meant for devs and downstreamers to test drive and flag us if >> we >> > > > messed >> > > > > > up >> > > > > > > on anything ahead of our rolling GAs. We are particular >> > interested >> > > in >> > > > > > > hearing from Coprocessor developers. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > The list of features addressed in 2.0.0 so far can be found >> here >> > > [3]. >> > > > > > There >> > > > > > > are thousands. The list of ~2k+ fixes in 2.0.0 exclusively >> can be >> > > > found >> > > > > > > here [4] (My JIRA JQL foo is a bit dodgy -- forgive me if >> > > mistakes). >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I've updated our overview doc. on the state of 2.0.0 [6]. >> We'll >> > do >> > > > one >> > > > > > more >> > > > > > > beta before we put up our first 2.0.0 Release Candidate by the >> > end >> > > of >> > > > > > > January, 2.0.0-beta-2. Its focus will be making it so users >> can >> > do >> > > a >> > > > > > > rolling upgrade on to hbase-2.x from hbase-1.x (and any bug >> fixes >> > > > found >> > > > > > > running beta-1). Here is the list of what we have targeted so >> far >> > > for >> > > > > > > beta-2 [5]. Check it out. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > One known issue is that the User API has not been properly >> > filtered >> > > > so >> > > > > it >> > > > > > > shows more than just InterfaceAudience Public content >> > (HBASE-19663, >> > > > to >> > > > > be >> > > > > > > fixed by beta-2). >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Please take this beta for a spin. Please vote on whether it >> ok to >> > > put >> > > > > out >> > > > > > > this RC as our first beta (Note CHANGES has not yet been >> > updated). >> > > > Let >> > > > > > the >> > > > > > > VOTE be open for 72 hours (Wednesday evening) >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Thanks, >> > > > > > > Your 2.0.0 Release Manager >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > 1. http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search= >> > 0x9816C7FC8ACC93D2 >> > > > > > > 3. https://goo.gl/scYjJr >> > > > > > > 4. https://goo.gl/dFFT8b >> > > > > > > 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HBASE/versions/ >> > 12340862 >> > > > > > > 6. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4 >> > > > > > > z9iEu_ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/ >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > -- >> > > > > > Best regards, >> > > > > > Andrew >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from >> > > truth's >> > > > > > decrepit hands >> > > > > > - A23, Crosstalk >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > Best regards, >> > > > Andrew >> > > > >> > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from >> truth's >> > > > decrepit hands >> > > > - A23, Crosstalk >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >
