+1 On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 10:44 AM, rahul gidwani <rahul.gidw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 > > On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 6:40 PM, Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > Hi folks! > > > > > > I've been working to get the test suite back to green on branch-1.2; > > > we have a lot of branches to track backport for and a non-trivial > > > amount of tech debt across all of them from the nightlies being > > > offline. > > > > > > After the stable pointer moves forward from branch-1.2 I'll keep doing > > > RM duty for it for ~6 months. Ideally I'd be doing monthly releases, > > > but that will largely depend on keeping the build green. After that, > > > it'd go EOM. > > > > > > What do y'all think about moving the stable pointer to branch-1.4 as > > > of the 1.4.2 release? > > > > > > If we move the stable pointer directly to 1.4 and skip over 1.3, what > > > do folks think about marking it EOM after we get a 1.3.2 release out? > > > > > > > > > Makes sense to me. Interested in Andrew's take. > > S > > >